ED. - This is a guest post by my
friend and local attorney Kathryn Wayne-Spindler. Kathryn specializes in family
law, which encompasses estate planning and divorce and child protection types
of cases. I end up getting involved in the disposal of the family home in many
divorce cases and it is not unusual that the property may have been owned by
one of the parties in the marriage before they even met. So, I asked Kathryn to
comment for a post on what happens and how the court decides who gets what in
divorce cases involving that scenario. Below is her reply:
In Michigan,
the courts typically prescribe an “equitable” division of assets during divorce
proceedings. This includes the equity in the family home. One factor that
alters the “even” split, however, is if one of the parties owned the home
before the marriage.
In the case
of one party owning the home prior the marriage, the courts will usually return
the down payment and any equity accumulated before the marriage, to the
original owner. The remainder of the appreciated value would be split according
to whatever formula the courts deem appropriate for the rest of the couple’s
assets.
This holds
true for marriages lasting less than 10 years. Long-term marriages are
different because the assets have become so co-mingled over the years that
determining which equity should be attributed to the down payment or other
factors, becomes too difficult. Divorce Attorney Kathryn
Wayne-Spindler said,
“The definition of long-term marriage depends on the judge. Some say more than
10 years, but certainly 15 or more would count as a long-term marriage.”
In a
long-term marriage, the proceeds from the sale of the family home, no matter
who purchased it originally, would be split equitably. As Kathryn
Wayne-Spindler has said, “equitable does not necessarily mean even. The courts
start at a 50-50 split but take infidelity, each party’s income potential, and
many other factors into account.”
The courts
also consider the amount of divisible assets when deciding who gets the profits
from the house. So even if one party owned the home before the marriage, if the
house is the couple’s only valuable asset, some of the proceeds will be awarded
to each person. “In these cases, the goal of property division is to make sure
that neither party will be left destitute,” said Wayne-Spindler.
In cases
where the couple has been married less than 10 years and they do have other
assets to divide, the original owner would need to provide documentation of the
original property purchase including closing papers and cancelled checks
showing the amount of the down payment.
Then a
historical appraisal would be performed. A certified appraiser, like Norma
Nicholson of Nicholson Appraisal Services in Milford, MI, would look at the
value of the home at the time of the marriage. She would take into account the
comps at the time, features and improvements. In addition to the retroactive
appraisal, the certified appraiser would do a current appraisal. The difference
in the two amounts gives the court a value of the divisible equity of the home.
In Michigan,
in the last decade especially, housing values have been on a roller-coaster
path. There are, unfortunately, cases where the house was purchased for a high
price and actually lost equity because of market conditions. “In that
situation, the equity was likely lost
forever.” The good news is that property values in this state are rebounding in
2015 and many homeowners are finding increased equity in their homes once
again.
In summary,
if the marriage lasted less than 10-15 years and there are other divisible
assets, the original down payment and equity accrued before the wedding would
generally be returned to the party that originally owned the home. The equity
accumulated between the marriage date and divorce would then be split
equitably.
Ed. - So, like many areas of the law
each case may end up slightly different, depending upon many factors; however,
it does appear that at least some of the equity that may have accumulated
during a marriage that lasted 10 years or more will be split. This may not be
what either party wanted to hear, but there are very few outcomes in a divorce
that end happily for either side. Should you become involved in a divorce
situation or one that seems to be headed in that direction, seek the advice
of good attorney. If you are in the
Milford, Michigan area I can think of no better attorney than Kathryn
Wayne-Spindler.